Family Meat.

Today I will talk you about a curius family meat. My ancestry is from Arabia Saudita. I remember a family meat from 4 years ago more less, it was on the department of my grandfather,  there was all the family of my father, grandparents Myrna and Ismael, uncles Erick, Yasmin, Jocelyn, my cousins Felipe, Erick, Carolina, Paula and his boyfriend, and the boyfriend of Jocelyn, my parents Cristian and Magdalena and my sister Catalina. We all eat talking a lot, and then started the suspicious event. We use to get together frequently. The ex-boyfriend of my uncle works in Ufology, he says that he is an ALIEN!, he tell us a lot of hilarious and intriguing stories and then started a lot of questions from all us. I remember this history because I think that other ways of life obviously can exist, but not necessary in our earth, so was surprising to hear a person who claim be one!. When our family is eating, the conversation is dispersed and divided, but I love that after that sometimes we all talk together about something contingent or relevant. No every family can keep each other continuously and see all frequently, in my mother family we see each other frequently too so I’m grateful about this.

Naked italians protest, and Judeo-Christian facism

Opinion about naked Italians, spark protest

Protesting it's a valuable recourse of political activity and it surge as reaction from ideas respect to a paradigm, but, ¿what about symbols?; Be naked it's considered absolutely normal in private, but in society it's related to shyness. Judeo-Christian theology and religiosity primordially constructed a moral conception imposed by Eurocentric fascist hegemonic power. I hope that in the future we can eradicate all the moral and religious ideas from humanity bringing space to etic autonomy as essential human right. In this way, it's shameful to live in world that collaborate with archaically ideas.

Short reflection about expressive fallibility of discourses in contemporary art.

 Bertolt Brecht

Hi all, today I'm doing a reflection about expressive fallibility of discourses in contemporary art.
In all arts we can analyze dimensions of the discourse, each one need that who interact with the art know previously the codes that is being used. And we can extract from the art creation, a political position independent in some cases of the creator intensions.

I think that the academy obstruct the content of art, trying to justify the creation for her technical value, and focusing all the teaching in this technique without reflecting about the philosophical, politic, semantic, spiritual and creative aspect that design.

¿Can we use the technique to develop artistic discourses coherent with our way of thinking non artistically?. In my opinion, it's possible, but we have to use codes that are previously learned by the audience; Theatrical procedures, body gestures, vocal onomatopoeic and (elementos musemanticos) can be used merged in one organic discourse making disappear the limits that separate one discipline from the other.

¿Why? because if we assume the art is a communication act, then we are obligated to consider that is essential talk about a concrete topic. Then according to this topic, the audience obviously can create her own conclusions, so this freedom bring value to the art ritual.